Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNN's Alternative Lunch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TNN's Alternative Lunch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. This article goes to great lengths asserting the notability of this radio station's guest hosts, but doesn't assert any for the station itself. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G11 Blatant advert, reads like PR/copyvio. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete G11 Whatever the case, the show's acronym for TNN makes absolutely no sense, and it's very unlikely that the powers that be at Spike TV have ever released their former name back and continue to hold trademark rights for it in all media. Also reading through this incredibly wordy article, it sounds like non-notable brokered programming. Nate • (chatter) 05:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of how this is notable. Reads like copy/pasted advertisement. RadioFan (talk) 02:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.