Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIVIT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
TIVIT[edit]
- TIVIT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A new Finnish IT company, founded in 2008. Tagged for speedy deletion. After reading the official site, I understood this is not just a software company, but instead a computer science research company founded by over 40 companies and organisations. This should perhaps set it apart from other Finnish companies. Weak delete unless it can be rewritten to remove the advertising. JIP | Talk 20:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless notability can be established. The main problem is not the advertisement-like language, which is not egregious and can be toned down, but the lack of independent reliable sources. As it is now, the article appears to fail WP:COMPANY. But perhaps there are independent reliable sources in Finnish that can be used to verify the essential content concerning TIVIT's operation and activities. 88.235.147.36 (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep,to have a page break rulles Ghndfcnjgjgndnhtdh (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking obvious troll vote. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per 88.235.147.36. The Rolling Camel (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.