Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIM Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TIM Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could find almost no media sources that would begin to establish this company's notability. This company was acquired by MergerMarket Group in 2017, which in turn is now a subsidiary of Acuris Group. The last information I was able to find was that it had just 49 employees. It's not to be confused with TIM s.p.a., the holding company for Telecom Italia. Fiachra10003 (talk) 02:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 02:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 02:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 02:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 02:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A long-term article created/updated by WP:SPAs. Searches for TIM Group, the former YouDevise name, and Trade Idea Monitor are finding only routine, announcement-based coverage; I am not seeing the level of coverage needed for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 18:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP, neither the references or Googling this company suggest notabiility. It could be redirected to Acuris. --Devokewater (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete with no objection to draftifiction with a requirement that notability be made clear with better references. WEPrism222 (talk) 05:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC) WEPrism222 (talk)[reply]
Delete does not meet notability and his little sources. Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.