Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THE One Total Home Experience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

THE One Total Home Experience[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be a WP:COATRACK violation, serving only as a way to make certain that the business and the trial are more closely associated by Google. I can't find much to say about the business itself. —Kww(talk) 19:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and refocus or WP:TNT delete - speaking from a strictly WP:GNG standpoint, this is a weak keep, but to be appropriate it needs to have much much more on the actual company itself and much less on the court case (which can be merged into the case's page if necessary), so I wouldn't object to removing the section or deleting the entire article. Ansh6 6 6 20:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.