Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THEO (fashion brand)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 03:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THEO (fashion brand)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tag for several years; seems promotional. -- Beland (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or possibly weak delete. The article is certainly promotional, but the large number of citations bears investigating. Upon investigation, the vast majority of them are just WP:ROUTINE coverage mentioning someone wore a design by the firm. Some of the earlier sources do have a little more text (often on Theo Dekan the person, rather than THEO the brand), but these are basically just interviews and extended quotes, and aren't independent. GNG not met, as there is no demonstration of significant and independent coverage. MarginalCost (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.