Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TG+

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close on 2 !votes however since nomination the article has been substantially sourced and improved and the nominator hasn't refuted the sources nor made any comment inregards to the article improvements so closing a keep (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 22:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TG+[edit]

TG+ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 (talk) 06:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Despite being a collection of live albums, I've managed to find a decent reveiw of the set (ref added to the article) which should give some notability. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are enough refs to pass. Robman94 (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.