Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TES Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Yash t 101 02:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

TES Public School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent advertisement and copyvio; created by a spamusername account and no actual sourcing - filled with junk like sports scores and dress codes. Orange Mike | Talk 02:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, per the usual result for high schools (it seems to be a joint primary and secondary school). The content does leave an awful lot to be desired, though, so I think we should stub it too. I would feel more confident in recommending that it be kept if I could find any actual sources, though. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 05:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but clean up significantly. The usual result for high schools, as noted above, is to keep the article. If this is rewritten as a neutral article and not just text lifted from their website, that will help matters greatly. —C.Fred (talk) 18:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: AFD is not clean up and per WP:NHS, --lTopGunl (talk) 08:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - verifiable high school and no reason to suspect that, with sufficient research, that the necessary sources cannot be found to meet WP:OR. TerriersFan (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.