Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEC42

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

TEC42

Advert for a startup company. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per CBW. I went to AFD it and you were already there! :) (Note, deleting this will orphan Image:Tec42logo.png.) FreplySpang (talk) 04:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• I dont see this as an advertisement. It was very informative about water cooling, helped me out a lot. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.162.58.214 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 25 February 2006.
• Bummer, theres no "cite this article" link —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.162.58.214 (talk • contribs) 04:43, 25 February 2006.
• water coolings the bizomb, someones reading too much into this shiz. MarryPoppins(Talk) 04:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.162.58.214 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 25 February 2006.
• Um. too close to call on advertising, i say leave it for a few days.DUkeofPete(Talk) 05:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• God, this screams "advertising" so much that it's not funny. Strong delete.--み使い Mitsukai 04:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Note this edit by 69.162.58.214 to remove a delete comment. Also this edit to forge MarryPoppins signature. Also the only edits by 69.162.58.214 and DUkeofPete at this time are to this article. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• 2nd comment User 71.162.37.175 only edits were two to this AfD, five attempts to linkspam the TEC42 website and one rather odd edit.
• Wow, you guys sure get down to business. TEC42 is my company and I posted this article. I dont know much else to say about it so I am sorry you feel it is advertising. I will continue to revise it tonight and hopefully by tommorrow I will have something more acceptable?Slopigyo(Talk) 0:31, 25 February 2006
• Yeah, clean it up a bit, I don't think we should delete it right away anyhow, appears someone out there likes it.. Sl33pingRules 05:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)User's only edit, quelle surprise --Calton | Talk 05:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Does not meet WP:CORP. --Hetar 05:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't meet WP:CORP, and the obvious sockpuppeting ain't helping. --Calton | Talk 05:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Thanks fot the help, and that is not me. You dont have to believe me but I think I know who it is. A friend of mine who finds the internet a playtoy. Slopigyo(Talk) 2:11, 25 February 2006
• Delete as advertising. The article goes on about how hip and cool the company is, but without previous knowledge, I find it hard to find out what the company actually does. JIP | Talk 11:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete looks like vanispamcruftisement to me :-) Just zis Guy you know? 14:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:VSCA. -- Krash (Talk) 22:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete due to lack of context (CSD A1). Tagged. Sockpuppets are also tagged (with 69.162.58.214 as the sockpuppeteer, not Slopigyo, as the latter did not vote on the AfD). --SYCTHOS^talk 00:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Never mind after reading above comments. I will re-consider the speedy delete when the new version is published. --SYCTHOS^talk 00:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.