Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAFMO
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TAFMO[edit]
- TAFMO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibly non-notable technology company. Possible promotion. Technopat (talk) 02:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unwikified business spam. Carrite (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —fetch·comms 02:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A couple of the refs are to company materials/press releases. One does mention TAFMO in a brief article in an Australian tech mag. The fourth I can't get to load. No Google presence whatsoever. Unnotable entity, it looks like to me. Herostratus (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I feel the article subject does not meet WP:COMPANYfor wiki inclusion. Pmedema (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.