Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T2 SDE (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
T2 SDE[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- T2 SDE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I G4'd it, but there's a claim sufficient sources are available, so I'm sending for another AfD. I personally have no opinion about the notability at this point. DGG ( talk ) 19:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Concerns from first AfD have not been addressed, there does not appear to be any significant coverage in independent sources of this product. Codf1977 (talk) 07:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As a potential reference for those looking for distribution build tools, the article is ideal. scope_creep (talk) 01:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this not a WP:ITSUSEFUL based argument, the issue is that it does not appear to be notable. Codf1977 (talk) 15:25, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Aside from Exactcode.com, the sources used are download sites and forums. I wasn't able to locate anything else. Exactcode.com looked promising at first, but turned out to be a primary source as the software's main sponsor (or perhaps the only one, I haven't checked). -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.