Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Hariri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 12:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

T. Hariri[edit]

Fails WP:BIO. There is some coverage but only from one source (The GW Hatchet) and probably not enough; the other sources I can find, either cited in the article or found via Google, are associated with the subject, trivial or appear to fail the reliable sources guideline. snigbrook (talk) 16:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I initially thought he would be notable when I saw a number of wikipedias in different languages have an article of him (clarify: More wikipedia articles in different languages doesn't = notability but it would seem to lead to more chances of finding reliable sources). But then I noticed that all except the French wikipedia have deleted it (with one also seeming to be in the deletion process). Calaka (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep The article is clearly straining to find notability, but references include NPR and a university which published his work. He seems to have some importance. Borock (talk) 18:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Coverage not significant, the sources on his poetry and University job are not reliable or questionable. He's not there yet with notability, it seems, may change in the future. Hekerui (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability test; this is a pretty clear vanity page. Noble-savage (talk) 05:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.