Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TĀLĀ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 22:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TĀLĀ[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles this is not notable. She has released only 2 EP's via independent label. Let's wait for a studio album. Stryn (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand there have been articles written about her in the telegraph, the Independent, buzzfeed and the Guardian. Those are "multiple, non-trivial, published works", I'd say.--Surfad (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-tough call, she seems to fall under too soon at the moment. As for the sources, that is kind of expected though to be honest as newer artists will have more sources. For now a Weak delete. Wgolf (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

07:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:BASIC. Source examples: [1], [2], [3]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - meets WP:BASIC but it's not good enough to have an article. --CarlosWagners (talk) 17:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.