Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Türker Armaner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Türker Armaner[edit]

Türker Armaner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY as meeting WP:AUTHOR, WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. However, the language issue may well mean I'm missing something. Has been tagged for notability for 6 years - hopefully a discussion will fully resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep The ref cited in article is a long signed review of his book in the online version of a major Turkish newspaper: google translation. I assume the other books will have similar reviews. These other books can be verified in Worldcat--that any US library has holdings shows them of some significance, considering the near-total neglect of Turkish studies in the US. The books are fiction, so his notability would be as an author, not a professor. His thesis too can be verified, and I added the link to the article. I can not see any reason why one would challenge an article of this nature, one with a good reference. An author whose works could not be verified would be another matter. There are many presumably notable non-European writers where that is the case, and our inability to write sustainable articles on them because of referencing problems is a significant & unfortunate cultural bias. When we can do as well as this, we're doing fine. DGG ( talk ) 21:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per DGG's additions and persuasive reasoning based on his expertise as a librarian. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination withdrawn - pleas close AfD based on 2 comments above. Boleyn (talk) 16:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.