Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sysmind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sysmind[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Only a single reference provided which is a broken link. Please add references if notable. Lakun.patra (talk) 07:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "...one of the fastest growing companies in North America." Really. I found one passing mention in a semi-reliable source. Everything else falls under routine directory listings and job postings. Complete failure of WP:CORPDEPTH. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The claim might have been credible when the article was first created, but there is nothing in this article to establish notability, either in terms of claims or reliable and verifiable coverage, nor could I find anything in Google searches or a review of the company's website. Alansohn (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article created and tended by a sequence of WP:SPA accounts. Multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) fail to turn up evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. – Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability -fails GNG –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.