Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syrnia (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 01:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Syrnia[edit]

The page has been deleted many times, but the AfDs were so long ago that I believe a 2^nd one is in order. Anyway, here's my rationale: The article is non-notable, and I'm guessing it hasn't been improved much since its past deletions. Thanks, > Animum < 23:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. QuagmireDog 02:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless it's been coverage in third-party sources, won an award, or otherwise met notability criteria. FrozenPurpleCube 03:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt to save future repeats of this. I don't see outside references that meet WP:RS; if someone comes up with some, I'll reconsider. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 03:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no assertion of notability, no links to support notability, nothing that comes even close to satisfying guidelines. Unless this is fixed, it should probably also be salted. --Haemo 07:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - No assertion of notability, no links to support notability, nothing that comes even close to satisfying guidelines. Probably could have been speedily deleted as a repost in the face of the other deletions. Also agree that the article should now be salted. DarkSaber2k 11:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.