Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synical

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synical[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverified, advert-filled BLP, created by the band and with no sources to back it up. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 21:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page was not created by the band but rather fans from europe and united states. All names mentioned in this article are real and will attest to the validity of the information listed. There are NO ADVERTISEMENTS OF ANY Kind in this article. Furthermore, the entire wikipage is very precise and to the point. No other complaints have been made except the Poweruser named Chase me ladies I'm the calvary. I suspect he has other motives for trying to delete this page. He might be involved with another band named SYNICAL(UK) or ex-members of SYNICAL and is trying to remove this page/article for spiteful, mean, and illegal intentions. Brian Haught <personal information redacted for privacy>. IN OTHER WORDS, the editor Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry IS TRYING TO "GAME THE SYSTEM" AND YES I irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. i agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

Realsynical, it is clear that you are trying to own the article and that you have some sort of conflict of interest here with regards to the band or those who support it. Please stop with the personal attacks or you may find yourself restricted from editing for disruption. Regards, –MuZemike 18:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re the coi, Realsynical claims to be brian haught when providing an image [1] duffbeerforme (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've done some cleanup on the article (which is unsourced and out of date). Strictly speaking this article could have been deleted under Speedy Deletion #A7, but it has been brought here instead. Keeping the article will require evidence of notability which is lacking completely so far. A good background to this can be found at the notability noticeboard header and the full guideline is here. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 02:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BAND criteria 6. Band is (or was) made up of two or more independently notable musicians as listed at page. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is an ugly mess, but Uncle Dick is right again, Keep for the reasons he says. I am certain this can be sourced with good references. Bearian (talk) 20:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.