Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvie Blum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvie Blum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking reliable sources to establish notability of a biography. There are some hints to notability, and the individual certainly exists- however, aside from having produced works and being in a couple coffee-table books, there are no sources discussing Blum- or even half-decent sources discussing Blum's work.

The page creator, Studio.LA, is an SPA account, having only created/edited Blum's page and very likely someone at her publicist's office, Fahey Klein Gallery.

I am fine with being proven wrong about the lack of sources, but as someone who knows nothing about hip art/gallery photography I couldn't find anything. tedder (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails notability criteria for models and photographers. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Armbrust above. Keristrasza (talk) 10:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete probably self-promo. I'm sorry, Sylvie. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 12:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. The article is too short and poorly sourced to assert norability. --Kudpung (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.