Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvia Villagran (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:26, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvia Villagran[edit]

Sylvia Villagran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a voice-over actress with no strong claim of notability under WP:NACTOR. While the article asserts a couple of new roles which make it just different enough from the original version that I don't consider it speediable A7, her notability hasn't gotten any stronger or been reliably sourced any better; this is resting entirely on directories and an Amazon.com sales profile for a book. Although I've done some copyediting on it, in its original form it had a very advertorial tone and style which strongly suggested a conflict of interest — a concern reaffirmed by the fact that when the creator uploaded the article's photograph, they gave the image source as "my photograph/ Previously published: on all my social media. Facebook, twitter, tumbler, my website." Wikipedia is not a place where people are entitled to post promotional public relations profiles of themselves just because they exist — to earn an article on here, a person must be reliably sourceable as passing one or more of our notability criteria. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 05:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete by all means - Mostly a behind the scenes as sound engineer and my searches found noting to suggest improvement or good notability here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:52, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.