Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syk Sense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Syk Sense[edit]

Syk Sense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Most of the sources cited in the article either mention his name only, or don't even mention him. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. DBrown SPS (talk) 08:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DBrown SPS: Please explain what "appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record" mean. I've seen this stale message being used multiple times before and it looks like spam when being used to nominate an article for deletion.Xboxmanwar (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you click on WP:ANYBIO (which preceded the statement you are confused about), you will see those exact words. If you have questions about the statement's meaning, you may wish to leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Magnolia677 (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Appears to have produced some notable records, and in a genre where the producer can make a major contribution to the music, but I found very little coverage of him, the best being these: [1], [2] which don't offer a lot. The article claims he was nominated for a Grammy, but the Grammy website has no results when searching for him. He may have worked on something that was nominated for a Grammy but that's a whole different kettle of fish. --Michig (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Little coverage in reliable sources. Does not pass notability criteria. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@206.125.47.10: Please explain how this article is "nonsense". Xboxmanwar (talk) 19:59, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.