Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syeda Falak (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Syeda Falak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much like the previous AfD noted, there is no actual evidence that this individual won "many national and international karate championships," at least those championships that would confer notability. I can't find much information about the International Karate Championship 2018 in Nepal, but what I can find indicates that it's an open competition, i.e. anyone can compete. Or it could be one of the other "International Karate Championships" that are held in Nepal every year (the 2nd, the 4th, the 8th...).

~~Originally tagged G4, but this was removed with no reason given.~~ ... discospinster _talk 13:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 13:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 13:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. There are enough changes that I'll grant that G4 doesn't apply, but there isn't enough to make me see that Falak is notable enough for an article. —C.Fred (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have restored the versions of the article from before the first AfD into page history for easy comparison. Here is a link to the last version before the (first) deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. at first I'm use WP:G4 but ' So Why' Decline speedy for because article contains sources not in the previously deleted article or discussed at AFD. i didn't think this article notable person because i search on google her name find some information but it don't mean Pass on WP:GNG. --Nahal^(T) 14:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no evidence that any notability has been gained since the article's previous deletion in May. Lacks any supporting evidence of meeting WP:NSPORT or WP:MANOTE. Coverage is still insufficient to meet WP:GNG. When this article was recreated, I was asked for comments about how to make it notable and I responded. All my suggestions were ignored, probably because there's nothing to support a claim of WP notability. Papaursa (talk) 18:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.