Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Harbour New Year's Eve Fireworks 2008–09

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Harbour New Year's Eve Fireworks 2008–09[edit]

Crystalballerisim I see. ViperSnake151 00:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. Also has absolutely no information to note inside it. DARTH PANDA ^duel 00:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although not a film, the spirit of WP:NFF fits this situation. WWGB (talk) 02:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, so, we don't know the theme, the performers involved, or the presenters? Recreate if more information surfacesm but even then, only if the information is enough to establish that this was a notable show/programme. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. This article is one of a series. It is not a controversial or problematic subject - but it is verifiable and notable - and given that it will be populated with data 2 months from now anyway, I see no reason to destroy another editor's hard work simply because they've had the good sense to plan ahead. --Gene_poole (talk) 04:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure-crystal balling of an event which I doubt deserves its own article anyway - why not combine these into a single article? Nick Dowling (talk) 04:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a generic article at Sydney Harbour New Year's Eve Fireworks but some editors prefer annual spinoffs. WWGB (talk) 01:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy. I can see how someone would want to plan ahead, but there's not enough info in the article to be useful in mainspace. Userfication allows people to work on the article without immediate deletion threats until it is ready. Gene Pool, do you want it? That said, an event attended by so many in Sydney and seen by many more is quite likely to be notable. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy or delete - Soon will be able to be referenced, userfying it until then would probably be a good move. — neuro^(talk) 14:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.