Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syafiq Rahman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syafiq Rahman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking this to AfD as Syafiq has played 1 min of professional football five years ago but done nothing of note since. The weakest possible passing of WP:NFOOTBALL is not enough when WP:GNG is not met. It is worth noting that Soccerway and Tribuna have no top tier appearances recorded and Playmaker Stats has the one.

Searches of Syafiq Rahman and Syafiq Abdul Rahman brought back only one passing mention in BH. The rest were just the usual database pages and Blogspot pages, which do not count towards notability. Clear consensus that such players aren't notable unless they meet GNG. 1 minute of football isn't enough to ignore that. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Worth adding that he doesn't appear to have an ongoing career and doesn't seem to have played football since 2017. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, 1 min is by far not enough, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator Fails GNG Aloolkaparatha (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.