Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sword breaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Flower party■ 00:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sword breaker[edit]

Thoroughly unencyclopedic, un-Wikified, and unreferenced substub. Hasn't grown or improved in 7 months. There isn't much to scrap here, so if such a weapon existed a better editor might as well start over. Durova 00:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. It sounds like someone made up a concept and then imagined how it would work. Wikipedia minus RPG cruft would be a beautiful thing. Brian G. Crawford 02:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is indeed a real weapon, and I would call the article more than a sub-stub. Verifiable. Grandmasterka 03:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That really doesn't verify the claim of the stub. These are weapons of modern manufacture and many modern manufacturers create "replicas" of fantasy weapons that never really existed. I came across this while I was categorizing weapons for Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Middle Ages task force and I honestly don't see any way to save the stub. Durova 04:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. If this is verifiable, someone can create a proper article on it sometime. Ned Wilbury 15:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Unreferenced and comes across as original research and opinion. — RJH 16:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research. Chairman S. ^Talk 20:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.