Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss Steelpan History
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 06:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Swiss Steelpan History[edit]
- Swiss Steelpan History (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability for this subject appears to be less than marginal. The article's author appears to design and build the instrument in question, hence some sticky WP:COI issues. Problems with WP:RS are also evident. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsure The german article (from the same author) has kept itself since february, which states that some notability may be given. Although the author might have some advertising background, I think the sources he provides could be reliable. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Possibly notable subject, but the badly translated article reads like WP:COI original research, has no inline references and the sources given do not seem to be especially reliable. Sandstein 14:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - needs more sources, but appears to be legitimately notable --T-rex 00:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, synthesis. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 01:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What is this a synthesis of? --T-rex 02:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A reading of WP:SYN might help clarify the question here. B.Wind (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that is what I meant. It's clear that the author is using his intimate personal knowledge of the Steelpan scene in Switzerland, and has written a piece of decent original research. Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 09:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A reading of WP:SYN might help clarify the question here. B.Wind (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That is more or less what I assumed, but I personally don't see a problem in combining Steelpan History with a particular country. --T-rex 15:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What is this a synthesis of? --T-rex 02:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.