Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swipes Lovin Wipes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Swipes Lovin Wipes[edit]
- Swipes Lovin Wipes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable manufacturing company. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, and an advert to boot. Phearson (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Ealdgyth - Talk 04:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ORG with evidently no third-party sources on the subject available. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 05:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This article does have third-party sources - please refer to the reference section. If Phearson could explain to me how the article is an advertisement, I'm all ears. Chicago2011 (talk) 01:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, the only sources here appear to be either from the website itself, therefore not third-party, or from a sponsor, therefore not third-party. As for the others, they either don't mention the company at all, are inaccessible (locked google docs?), or are not published - primary source emails. You'll need to find significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources for this article to stand. Check out WP:ORG for more. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 22:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.