Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet tree
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet tree[edit]
- Sweet tree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
One of the least notable articles I've come across, how it has lasted 6 months is beyond me! PROD template was removed before so now it has to come to AfD. Smartse (talk) 11:19, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As it stands it is non notable. No References or sources to say why it is important. G
ainLine ♠ ♥ 11:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Delete I can't find reliable sources for this tree. I also can't find alternative content since there are a lot of "Sweet Tree" businesses that crowds my google search, none of which stands out as notable. Google Books and Google News did not give good leads either.--Lenticel (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google finds no evidence of notability, and the article provides none. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MADEUP. Even if the tree is recognized locally, it's not notable and it doesn't go by this made-up name. Drawn Some (talk)
- I was going to suggest speedy deletion, but there actually is a place in Massachusetts called Sweet Tree Service created by the Sweet family. But the website doesn't say anything about a single tree being named for the company or the family, so delete. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 17:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, and my previous prod [1]. Bearian (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.