Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Sioux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Akhilleus (talk) 19:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Sioux[edit]

Not notable. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep A google search shows that this film has an entry in imdb. It also shows that this film was released in 1937 instead of 1944. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The date 1937 is correct per Beck and Friedwald's Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies: A Complete Illustrated Guide to the Warner Bros. Cartoons, so I've emended the article accordingly. I'm ~~neutral~~ on the AfD, as I doubt that we need an article on every cartoon WB made. Deor 16:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After further thought, I'm going to change my opinion to weak delete. I doubt that the reference to Film Daily can be correct, since the cartoon dates from seven years before the supposed review of it as a "new film". If a better sourced and fuller article about this can be created, I'd be willing to accept it, but this one just has too many problems. Redirecting it to Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography would just result in a circular redirect in that article. Deor 03:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to Friz Freleng ~~Delete~~ Neutral. Now, I'm perplexed. An indifferent early cartoon, but made by a famous animator. Clarityfiend 16:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 01:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- --sparkit ^TALK 02:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge? - is there a list of Warner Bros. cartoons this can be merged to? Otto4711 14:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There's Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography, but many of the individual entries are redlinked, and I'd have to see a really persuasive argument to convince me that there needs to be 1000+ articles to cover the whole batch. Deor 16:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm good with a redirect to that article. If some more substantive information becomes available no prejudice to recreating. Otto4711 17:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Filmography already mentions this cartoon. Being made by a famous animator does not make this cartoon notable. Ichibani 22:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge is unnecessary; most of the links in the filmography are red, not pointing to the animator. Ichibani 22:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ichibani - an unnecessary article. - G 1 ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 02:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I completely agree with Ichibani. Astrale01^talk_contribs 13:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.