Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Melody (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fiona Fung. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Melody (album)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Came here from Talk:Sweet Melody (song)#Requested move 1 November 2021 and noticed back and forth blanking of this page. Hopefully, this AfD will generate consensus on if this album meets inclusion criteria. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usually the nominator is presumed to be in favour of deletion, but it's not so clear in this case - @Rotideypoc41352: could you clarify whether you have a position on this? Colin M (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is looking like WP:FORUMSHOPPING regardless if it's intentional or not. The de facto action would be to redirect to Fiona Fung as what shows in the page's history. – The Grid (talk) 23:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? How is this forum shopping? The nominator wasn't even involved in any of the back-and-forth redirecting and unredirecting that's been happening in the history. I think they were right to bring it here for discussion. Colin M (talk) 00:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I said intentional or not, I think the discussion could have been made on the talk page before reaching here. – The Grid (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fiona Fung. WP:SIGCOV only in two reviews already in the External links section. DuckDuckGo search yielded nothing else, so I don't think the album meets criteria for a standalone article. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fiona Fung. Something odd is happening with the move discussion and redirect arguments, but I recommend a permanent redirect. The article says the album charted but I suspect that the charts are unreliable per WP:CHARTS. The article currently has links to two reviews; one is dead and the other may be viable but is quite brief. I can find nothing else reliable, and note that someone in the move discussion reached the same conclusion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fiona Fung#Discography. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. A WP:BEFORE shows nothing beyond South China Morning Post. SBKSPP (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.