Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Hitch-Hiker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Hitch-Hiker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not a very notable song, even though the band is very notable. Also no context in article, or cites/references Alan - talk 00:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have added references to the article to establish its notability (top 10 single in the US, top 40 single in the UK). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Metropolitan90's work. According to the WP:NSONGS standards, the song is "probably notable" as a result of its chart appearances. In addition, there now appears to be just enough "verifiable material" to support an independent article, which is my preference here over a merge into CCR's article. Gongshow ^Talk 07:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable.--Michig (talk) 07:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As per work added above. Notability is confirmed. --Fbifriday (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Most definitely notable. Only reference to definition of "Greasy King" --Hyperion1961 (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:NM --Europe22 (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep. Per all the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A cursory effort at WP:BEFORE would show that the song charted (e.g., [1]) so passes WP:NSONGS, and there are obviously plenty of sources to satisfy WP:N. Rlendog (talk) 01:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.