Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Amy Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Amy Lee[edit]

Not notable. No entries on any major filmography database. Other than links to pages that review her website, she hardly has any mention anywhere else. Thus Delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 01:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this three sentence entry on a non-notable prostitute. Brian G. Crawford 01:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 03:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.ZornArmand 03:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)zornarmand[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Prime candidate for PROD. Borderline speedy, too (if only she wasn't a "star"). --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 03:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Speedy, actually. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 04:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Focoe 08:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Ugur Basak 10:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 13:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:28, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn per nom. Monicasdude 14:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bhoeble 15:21, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this stubby, nn pornstar article. Staxringold 19:28, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, delete, though bonus points for mentioning centimeters first. ProhibitOnions 20:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I vote to keep because, sad to say, I know who she is, and because stubs are a part of wikipedia. We cant delete an article for simply being too short. -- Pal5017 23:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Fill it in more. --Masssiveego 07:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep At least for a few months, to see if the lady does any more work of note. If she doesn't do anything to keep her fan base, she will soon be out of wikipedia. -- User:noi_aventurer 0:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
On the contrary, Delete, at least for a few months. If she actually does something notable, she can be put back. Currently, I don't see anything that distinguishes her. Non-notable, dime-a-dozen webmodel. Fan1967 00:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN Nigelthefish 16:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She's worth noting and being present here on wikipedia, I was searching for more information on this actress and was hopeing that I would find it here. I will promptly try to update this entry if i can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.41.214 (talk • contribs)
For what it's worth, a quick check of her website indicates that her name should be spelled Amylee rather than Amy Lee, and the one-word spelling does increase her Google hit count significantly. I'm not generally convinced that porn stars really deserve Wikipedia articles, but there's enough interest in them out there. And given that I'm a gay man, I'm not about to pretend I could assess a het-porn actor's notability on the basis of whether I've heard of her or not. Strictly a point for discussion; I don't really care whether this is kept or not and accordingly won't vote. Bearcat 20:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.