Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweeney's Flight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Sweeney Astray. czar ⨹ 05:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sweeney's Flight[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing any reviews of this book of photos. Not much of a seller on amazon.com.[1] Clarityfiend (talk) 01:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Sweeney Astray. The book Sweeney Astray is notable and I can find various sources discussing it, but I can't really find enough coverage of this book to really show how it's independently notable. From what I can see, this book pretty much takes snippets of the original text in Sweeney Astray and sets it to photographs, so this would be a reasonable merge in this instance. I'll try to clean up the article for the main book some, as it's pretty deplorably sourced at the moment. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge There are a couple of obscure reviews cited at the photographer's website, but not enough to establish notability. I did find this terrific interview with the photographer, which might be useful, especially if someone wants to write an article on her. The sources at the main article are in much better shape compared to a week ago. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.