Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Budget (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 01:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Budget[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion almost two years ago per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. It was suggested then it should be moved to wikisource, however wikisource doesn't want it[1]. There have been no substantial improvements or content changes since the last AFD in 2005[2]. I'd like to renominate it, with the same motivation as last time: WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Henrik 08:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't think a budget proposal from any country would be encyclopedic. Possibly redirect to Economy of Sweden, but don't see the liklihood of searching for this. --Bren ^talk 09:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator. One thing I forgot to mention is that the article is also outdated, there is a new budget in effect as of 2007. Henrik 09:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unencyclopedic. Punkmorten 09:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-this page, but some information on Swedish national spending wouldn't go amiss on the Sweden article. Not this random collection of figures, though.--Rossheth | Talk to me 10:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as outdated and unencyclopedic.-- danntm ^T _C 14:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article is outdated and unencyclopedic as a simple collection of figures without citation to any references or resources. Camaron1 | Chris 19:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.