Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Breaded Fishes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was breaded delete. Coredesat 05:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Swedish Breaded Fishes[edit]
- Swedish Breaded Fishes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Recently invented recipe, speedy was declined, author contested prod with {{hangon}}, but clearly fails inclusion guidelines. Rigadoun (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a cook book (WP:GAMEGUIDE). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#HOWTO. --Evb-wiki (talk) 16:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per user:Evb-wiki.Osli73 (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Evb-wiki. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, and there is no indication this particular recipe is notable. GlobeGores (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, munch munch. Mmmmm unsourced recipe stub... Cirt (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per nom. GtstrickyTalk or C 16:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Justin chat 17:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete That is cookbook material not wikipedia material. RuneWiki777 20:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree, Wikipedia is not a cookbook. Malinaccier (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT#HOWTO and an empty Google search. — Wenli (reply here) 02:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —dima/talk/ 05:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per User:Wenli, How-to's can be re-written but lack of notability can't be fixed. --Lenticel (talk) 07:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:NOT. However, I did save the recipe (I tend to archive certain articles that don't look like passing AFD because they're interesting) and if anyone ever needs it in the future, just send me a message. --Sharkface217 01:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.