Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swati Aggarwal (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Swati Aggarwal[edit]

Swati Aggarwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in reliable sources; fails WP:NACTOR, and WP:GNG as well. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Lacks in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, and I don't see if the subject has played a significant/major role in films listed in the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and consider Salt. These types of fanpages are becoming more of a problem on WP. They're generally people that are "known" in some sense by a fanbase (like an obscure actress in this case), but that clearly fall short of our notability guidelines (like having only 1 local news article as a source). This article was recreated once and probably will be again. Agricola44 (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.