Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swastika railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. NW (Talk) 02:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swastika railway station[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing really notable besides the fact that the word Swastika (not to be confused with 卐) is added in there. Main Edges (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's notable not because of its name, but because it's a rail station. As WP:OUTCOMES indicates, the community has determined that rail stations are notable. The article would've been created no matter what the name is.--Oakshade (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:OUTCOMES actually says "...individual stations are questionable". My view on this one is neutral though. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All railway stations are notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdraw due to the statements made by Dylanfromthenorth. 卐 The Main Edge 卐 02:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.