Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarm-Bruteforcer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swarm-Bruteforcer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article cites no sources at all, and I can find no evidence anywhere that it satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (Note: I proposed deletion via WP:PROD, and the creator of the article removed the PROD tag. Another editor then put another PROD tag on the article, contrary to policy, so I have removed it.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. (I was the erroneous 2nd prodder.) Υπογράφω (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 09:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.