Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Gopal Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Gopal Das[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Granted this a subject where sources may not be accessible but this existed since December 2006 with no significant improvement and my searches found nothing at all aside from one result for a more recent Swami Nrittya Gopal Das in 1990s. Not to mention I searched for connections with the currently listed sources and found nothing. Systematic bias aside, there' simlly nothing to suggest improvement and keeping. Notifying tagger Righteousskills and author LRBurdak. SwisterTwister talk 21:57, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 06:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible keep -- The article cites a book and an article. We should assume good faith by the creator: I do not have access to his sources. I suspect that the article may overstate the man's significance. He should more like a civil rights campaigner than a freedom fighter, but that is a matter that can be resolved by tagging the article. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Even with AGF, the current pickings for notability are too slim to satisfy WP:GNG, and nothing on searches shows it can be made better. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The lack of any verifiable sourcing is troublesome to me. I'm sensitive to the bias against offline sources, but not a single editor can verify anything in here.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.