Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Atmapriyananda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 19:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Atmapriyananda[edit]

Swami Atmapriyananda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable education administrator. Article was deleted twice before but was recently restored when a reference was provided. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Curro2 (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as I thought, as a Vice Chancellor, this would be notable. Delete perhaps unless it can be shown this is a notable enough university where the Vice Chancellor is also going to be notable, I'm inviting DGG for better analysis. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Vice-chancellor is head of a university in UK-dervived systems. That's considered notable for any significant university, not just famous ones. DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per DGG's invocation of WP:PROF#C6 -- I think that a government-established university almost anywhere has come to have the status of "major institution" for C6. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.