Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svpply

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Svpply[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, looks like more spam. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't appear to pass our guidelines for company articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - small supply company; no evidence of notability, but I am willing to reconsider if sources can be found. Bearian (talk) 20:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC) (P.S. There's lots of Ghits, but none seem to be reliable.) Bearian (talk) 20:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.