Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzuki RM series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suzuki RM series[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable motorcycle series. I have originally added a reference on 15 November 2015, which I realized to be unreliable. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: So a motorcycle in production for 37 years has absolutely no coverage? And it was used for racing, and had no coverage? I find that hard to believe. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I should note that I do not follow motorcycles at this point in my life, but I'm sure someone out there can scrape up some references for use in the article. As I wrote above, a motorcycle in production for 37 years has to have some coverage in third party publications. Especially since it was regularly used for racing. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 ^talk 02:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.