Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suspended tension backstop

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 00:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended tension backstop[edit]

Suspended tension backstop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious, unverifiable. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred G. Wheelock, AfD for its alleged inventor; unverifiable bio as well. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This should be treated as being as unverifiable as the article on the equipment's purported inventor. That one of the only two references is to a family's archives is telling. Syek88 (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep we need some sort of article for a baseball backstop. Some of this content is probably just in need of verification. However, I am not sure how much of the Wheelock content is needed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane talk 03:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I also see nothing to verify this. Needing an article on a baseball backstop is not a good reason to keep an article that doesn't meet Wikipedia guidelines. We do have Glossary of baseball (B)#backstop anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.