Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susie Leica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Michigan USA. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 19:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Susie Leica[edit]

Susie Leica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If Leica's being Miss Michigan USA was even marginally notable we would have an article from the Detroit News or Detroit Free Press on her, not that such an article would neccesarily demonstrate notability. However the total lack of such articles shows that she is totally and completely unnotable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • different medium same deal. I think you need to bring your googling ability up to your snark ability. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Still fails under the most recent precedent but at least pretend to try before you make outlandish claims. PageantUpdater (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- a non notable state level winner. All coverage relates to BIO1E and is considered routine. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I contest that BIO1E applies. "We should generally avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met". I contest that being a state titleholder and competing at Miss USA is not "not significant' as per the third condition. PageantUpdater (talk) 12:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.