Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushma Adhikari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sushma Adhikari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:NMODEL and WP:BASIC; does not have in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources and lacks the accolades to be notable by default. Spiderone 10:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources that are currently in the article are essentially spam and I can find nothing better. Blablubbs|talk 11:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources, as Blablubbs said, are spam, and I'm quite sure they aren't even reliable in the slightest way. That, or it was like self written. Stay safe, Cyclone Toby 12:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Perhaps she is well known in Nepal, but the sources in the article do not seem to be secondaries. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NMODEL and the references are useless. Coreykai (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I can see that the creator has added a few more references to the article but they all just look like promo photo shoots so I'm still strongly supporting deletion Spiderone 17:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Requires proper work - All reference sources are not reliable or notably categories. Create this article on basis of advertisement categories and it is against the law of Wikipedia. All references are not news sources. Maybe the person is famous in Nepal but I can't find any news source with public news. I request to article creator to find the real source of public news, not a blog page or local website page.Micromadmonkey 12:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Coverage seems light and sources are formatted incorrectly. Needs work. Peter303x (talk) 02:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.