Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushil Pokharel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sushil Pokharel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatantly promotional (and always has been). None of the references that are currently in the article ([1][2][3][4][5]) constitute sigcov of him as a person, and a BEFORE search doesn't turn up anything useful, at least not in English. There may be some in other languages, but regardless, I think this is probably solidly in TNT territory. Best, Blablubbs|talk 11:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs|talk 11:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Blablubbs|talk 11:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. promotional article, no notability or SIGCOV. --hroest 14:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete purely PROMO, no SIGCOV, Nepali language search turns up some self-promoting social media, nothing approaching RS. --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.