Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Singleton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snowball speedy delete as a blatant advertisment and failing WP:RS and WP:N. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Susan Singleton[edit]
- Susan Singleton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This was seemingly started as an autobiography. The person does not seem to be at all notable and I see no reason for inclusion. At the moment it reads like a CV/advert and I can't see how this could be changed Smartse (talk) 19:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Autobio with no independent references. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article was apparently created by the subject. Of the eight sources listed, none seem to be both secondary and reliable. A Google news search only turns up a story about divorced mothers mentioning her as an example. Rees11 (talk) 20:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete commercial self promotion by Susan Singleton, not backed up with secondary references. TeapotgeorgeTalk 20:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete borderline notable (5 kids £240/hour) but a lawer :). Polargeo (talk) 23:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Non-notable POV piece.--Sandor Clegane (talk) 02:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Should have been A7 and G11 speedied. Non-notable autobiography. ukexpat (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.