Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Molloy Owens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BIO requires multiple independent sources, and regardless of its triviality, one is not multiple. --Core desat 22:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Molloy Owens[edit]

Prodded as non-notable, unsourced, possible hoax. De-prodded without comment. Some assertions, but no sources, have been added so original reasons for tagging remain. Pleclech 06:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: apparently not a hoax; see the university website. But there is nothing to suggest sufficient notability here. Heimstern Läufer 06:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep She is not a hoax. I found an award for her which is cited at the site, but it sounds like she teaches some pretty basic skills. --Kevin Murray 06:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She doesn't appear to be notable. TJ Spyke 06:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless notability established. MER-C 08:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just an instructor doing her job like thousands of others. Unless the coincidences in the last paragraph are statistically significant, there is nothing in this article to justify a wikipedia article. (And speaking as someone who was born on the same day as his father 19 years later, you can guess my feelings there!) Emeraude 13:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - But this means I want an article about my teaching, thesis, and several publications too! But seriously, the article lacks good establishment of notability. To the author(s): are there any sources I am missing? CyberAnth 01:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, albeit not a hoax, no notability. SkierRMH 12:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.