Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrendra Gangadean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surrendra Gangadean[edit]

Not notable under WP:PROF, and anyway, the article is really a Coatrack for a book that is not notable under WP:BK. Nearly the same text was added to existence of God, philosophy of religion, natural theology, and presuppositional apologetics, which seems a bit like POV pushing, not to mention that it asserts God's existence has been definitively proven. Also, it's a possible copyvio. Flex (talk/contribs) 04:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: simply a WP:COATRACK of one of the topic's claims. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 05:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, specifically WP:COATRACK. Author is POV pushing. andy (talk) 08:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tried searching in Google News archives, and also in a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but could find no sources that would help to establish WP:N notability. Delete unless someone finds some sources. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Professors at community colleges are rarely academically notable and this case does not appear to be an exception. GoogleScholar shows one book review (for some reason listed several times), but not much else in terms of academic citability[1]. Almost nothing in GoogleBooks either[2]. WorldCat shows one book that is not widely carried by academic libraries[3]. Nothing else to indicate academic notability. Fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PROF as shown by Nsk92. --Crusio (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Nsk92. Pete.Hurd (talk) 16:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hopelessly POV article about a nonnotable person. That being said: I was shocked to see this, as I know several people who once knew the man! Nyttend (talk) 21:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.