Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suraj Hua Maddham (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham.... Star Mississippi 02:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suraj Hua Maddham[edit]

Suraj Hua Maddham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

entirely unsourced, no indication of notability Gugrak (talk) 05:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a removed redirect - see earlier AFD - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Suraj_Hua_Maddham

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This would need evidence of specific notability if the prior AfD decision is to be set aside. The present text lists awards but without references, and particularly without demonstrating that these were specifically about this song; the pre-redirect version was no better. An archived Planet Bollywood review of the film soundtrack album is complimentary ("Melody, singing, meaningful lyrics, sweet music that just makes you want to pump up the volume. That is an understatement when describing, Suraj Hua Maddham... As if the song wasn’t good enough just imagine what the Egypt locales will do in making this a treat! The instrumentalism... is just proof that this is the best song on the soundtrack" [1]), but I am unconvinced that is enough to demonstrate specific notability. AllyD (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore redirect: Unless someone finds evidence of specific WP:NSONG notability (for which the source I discussed above is insufficient), the redirect consensus of the 2012 AfD should stand. AllyD (talk) 06:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.