Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Support for Nazis in the USA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support for Nazis in the USA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Machine translated mess that has not even been formatted. Maybe an article could be written about this subject, but this needs WP:TNT Jac16888 ^Talk 23:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this not a duplicate of what's currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US support for the Nazism? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Draftify and restore when ready~~ Delete: I recommended at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US support for the Nazism that that article be dropped in favor of this one, though it's been suggested that neither has the correct title. I admit that this article in its current state is a mess, but its creator, Doovinator (talk · contribs), said (in the history) he will continue to work on it. It's been more than 24 hours with no substantial change, so I think the article should be moved to Draft:Support for Nazis in the USA where he (along with any other interested parties) can work on it at his leisure. ubiquity (talk) 13:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I now tend to agree with NinjaRobotPirate (talk · contribs) that no one is going to fix this, so I'm changing my !vote to delete. ubiquity (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think anyone is going to work on this. I'm not. If someone actually does want to work on it, well, all they need to do is click on the button to create a brand-new machine-translated article. So, what's lost by deleting this? Per WP:MACHINETRANSLATION: "Wikipedia consensus is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Duplicate, and so badly written initially and equally badly translated as to be not worth salvaging. (Also, any article that uses Charles Higham as a credible source probably fails NPOV just on the face of it.) Anmccaff (talk) 06:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Look at this shotgunned request for transalation of the article. Is there a way of requesting cleanup of the Portugese version? Anmccaff (talk) 07:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.