Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstar (2008 Hindi film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn! (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 21:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superstar (2008 Hindi film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No citation, not notable. Arunudoy ^(talk) 08:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 10:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 10:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
keep found source of notability https://g.co/kgs/1Ukcrc
Keep easily notable. Isn't the most basic step before putting an article up for the deletion is to first make sure it really doesn't have sources online (per WP:BEFORE)? Because there are plenty. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sources added. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as the sources are added, I too to vote for keep and tender my apology for nominating for AfD. Regards - Arunudoy ^(talk) 04:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Arunudoy; admin should note that the nominating user seeks to withdraw the nomination. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.